| 摘要: | 本研究含緒論與結論共計五章，自「空間」角度切入，以邱妙津、陳雪乃至八王子以降為核心考察，輔以九○年代其他女同敘事作為參照，希冀能藉由空間視角進行觀照，從象徵性空間解讀較大範疇的文化符碼，兼及「鉅觀」與「微觀」的空間研究，思索空間的「文學特殊性」，並對照作者的史傳研究，探討作者如何以書寫進行空間再現，「公共空間」與「私人空間」又如何互涉、中介與跨界，旨在重讀出九○年代中一種不完整、破碎、難以尋索出蹤跡的女同小說空間。 有別於以往「主題式」的分類方式，將女同創作一概而論，全文架構以「史」的方式論證，重新爬梳女同寫作史及社會運動的對應關係，但在保有時間性之際，更試圖彰顯個人的生命史及創作的特殊性，透過「空間」的研究取徑對一直以來「故事主線」式的敘事史觀進行反思。除了探索女同的「放逐」敘事，亦試圖凸顯隱藏於抒情詩學的敘事下，因邊緣化而被迫放逐的女同書寫中一股交錯、頡頏的生猛力量。尤其值得注意是，「放逐」之後的女同情感政治與女同文學史之間的關係，更顯示出女同經驗於文化翻譯與在地生成下的錯綜複雜面向，並歸結出全球化與地方文化之間的張力，文本與歷史時代的空間性的呼應、協商與對抗。透過女同作家群的空間再現，挖掘出女同文學史中面對污名歷史所呈現的系譜圖像。 This thesis attempts to discuss the perspective of “space representation” in lesbians literature, including not only three main writers’ literature - Qiu Miao Jin, Chen Xue and Ba Wang Zhi, and that of other elegant lesbian narratives in 1990s as reference. In order to reread the “space” concept in lesbian narratives, which is incomplete, broken and difficult to search out the traces, the author attempts to observe from the symbolic space to a larger area of cultural codes, including “macro” and “micro” perspectives of space studies, and finally think about the “literary particularity” in space research. Base on the three main writers’ life stories and biographies, the author also discusses how these writers represent the “space” concept by words and how intricate are between “public space” and “private space”. Unlike the "theme" type of classification in the past, which is lumping together all sundry lesbian fictions, this thesis demonstrates the issue of “historic approach” that re-combing the relations between history of lesbian writing and social movements. Not only maintaining “timing” in the frame of this thesis, but also highlighting the individual's life history and the specialties in works help us to rethink the path of research through the whole space research in "story line" type of narrative history. In addition to exploring lesbians with the "diaspora" narrative, the author also try to raise up the interlaced, resistive, and slashing power hidden in the lyric poetry of the narrative, which might be marginalized and forced to exile. Especially, the relationship between lesbian emotional politics and the history of lesbian literature beyond “diaspora” reveals lesbian experience under the global translation and local culture, as same as the response, negotiation, and confrontation in spatiality between text and history. As the result, the author wants to discuss deeply the archeological image shown by the space representation of lesbian writers when the history of lesbians literature faced a stigma. |
