English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 66984/66984 (100%)
Visitors : 23049239      Online Users : 180
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.lib.ncu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/51106


    Title: Dissociating the contributions of human frontal eye fields and posterior parietal cortex to visual search
    Authors: Muggleton,NG;Kalla,R;Juan,CH;Walsh,V
    Contributors: 認知與神經科學研究所
    Keywords: TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION;SPATIAL ATTENTION;CEREBRAL-CORTEX;TMS;CONJUNCTION;SACCADES;SELECTION;INVOLVEMENT;ACTIVATION;MOVEMENTS
    Date: 2011
    Issue Date: 2012-03-27 18:21:48 (UTC+8)
    Publisher: 國立中央大學
    Abstract: Muggleton NG, Kalla R, Juan CH, Walsh V. Dissociating the contributions of human frontal eye fields and posterior parietal cortex to visual search. J Neurophysiol 105: 2891-2896, 2011. First published April 13, 2011; doi:10.1152/jn.01149.2009.-Imaging, lesion, and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) studies have implicated a number of regions of the brain in searching for a target defined by a combination of attributes. The necessity of both frontal eye fields (FEF) and posterior parietal cortex (PPC) in task performance has been shown by the application of TMS over these regions. The effects of stimulation over these two areas have, thus far, proved to be remarkably similar and the only dissociation reported being in the timing of their involvement. We tested the hypotheses that 1) FEF contributes to performance in terms of visual target detection (possibly by modulation of activity in extrastriate areas with respect to the target), and 2) PPC is involved in translation of visual information for action. We used a task where the presence (and location) of the target was indicated by an eye movement. Task disruption was seen with FEF TMS (with reduced accuracy on the task) but not with PPC stimulation. When a search task requiring a manual response was presented, disruption with PPC TMS was seen. These results show dissociation of FEF and PPC contributions to visual search performance and that PPC involvement seems to be dependent on the response required by the task, whereas this is not the case for FEF. This supports the idea of FEF involvement in visual processes in a manner that might not depend on the required response, whereas PPC seems to be involved when a manual motor response to a stimulus is required.
    Relation: JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
    Appears in Collections:[認知與神經科學研究所 ] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML495View/Open


    All items in NCUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    社群 sharing

    ::: Copyright National Central University. | 國立中央大學圖書館版權所有 | 收藏本站 | 設為首頁 | 最佳瀏覽畫面: 1024*768 | 建站日期:8-24-2009 :::
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback  - 隱私權政策聲明