核能四廠興建與否的議題這十多年來在國內備受重視，核能四廠是我國歷年來核能政策的延續也是政府十四項建設之一，從政黨輪替、社會攻訐導致核四廠從開 始興建至中途停建最後又宣佈復建，在在影響到營造廠商對專案工程控管的不確定性。建廠至今核四廠的履約爭議不斷，大體而言可歸類為兩大項目：一、建廠背景的不同，其內容包括：（1）建廠模式及背景與核一二三廠不同（2）Component Bases（3）美國核工基礎能力衰退（4）AE缺少經驗及能力（5）台電公司自有人力僅負責工務管理（6）建廠階段之民情不同，二、承包商履約所遭逢之困境，其內容包括：（1）簽約時間約在八十八年前後（2）開工落後遭遇停工復工（3）台電公司設計延宕（4）設計圖說不完整（5）變更設計及澄清文件頻仍。在在構成可歸咎於業主的情事變更，如果無法研擬出一套解決方式，承包商也無法繼續履約，將影響整體公共工程之進度。 而政府採購由規劃、設計、招標、施工、驗收及保固，期間皆可能會產生爭議，但施工階段之履約爭議最為複雜，對工程成敗影響最大。故本研究以核能四廠曾發生過之履約爭議處理案件加以歸類、整理，經由專家訪談；蒐集資料中整理出履約爭議的原因、類型、處理方式及處理績效，並針對所彙整之內容綜合分析後，彙整出一套履約爭議處理機制，經由案例說明證實此機制之可行性，以作為日後該機關履約爭議實務之參考。The 4th nuclear power plant project lasts for years. It has experienced cardinal changes and even overall construction suspension. The project schedule control becomes troublesome to either the contractors or owner. As a result, disputes and cost compensations based schedule changes have been plagued the parties for years. The purpose of this study is to establish a dispute settlement framework in order to determine the compensations caused by schedule-orientated disputes. This study starts with a comprehensive literature review, which derives a preliminary outline leading to the expert interview. A total of 38 experts are interrogated and detailed dispute settlement documents from 38 schedule-related dispute cases are collected. The expertise and the settlement data suggest 5 criteria for later schedule-related disputes including how to determine (1) overhead and administrative costs within original schedule, (2) lump sum costs of specific item(s) within original schedule, (3) adjustment of unit costs for new extended schedule, (4) overhead and administrative costs for new extended schedule, and (5) lump sum costs of specific item(s) for new extended schedule. This study finally utilizes five cases to illustrate how the criteria work and what the results come out using the criteria. The findings would facilitate practitioners in dealing with such type of disputes so as to save time and efforts in a relatively fair basis.
