| 摘要: | 救命寶寶是一個新興科技下的產物，在人工生殖領域由於其可能造成憲法上和倫理上的疑慮，故對於此種人工生殖類型我們應給予管制。而我國就救命寶寶是如何進行管制，則為本論文的探討重心。本文除了透過法規分析探之外，亦會以電訪或電子郵件的方式向相關負責單位詢問實務上的操作流程。
由於救命寶寶其牽扯的範圍相當廣，引起的爭議也相當多，其在胚胎階段時期就已引起相當多的爭辯，如：我們對於胚胎因採取何種程度的保護措施，是採取人的模型、細胞模型還是尊重模型。除了保護程度的爭議外其亦會產生許多憲法上的爭議，如：人性尊嚴、生命權、生育自決權、被救助者健康權和基因歧視…等諸多問題，究竟我們該如何去進行權利的衡量和消除可能產生的爭議。
透過上述可以顯示救命寶寶是一個相當重要的議題，我們應對其建立妥善的管制流程，藉以降低其可能產生的社會爭議，而我國是如何對救命寶寶為管制？我國並未對救命寶寶設置專法予以管制，也亦未明確規範其管制流程，此部分將可能造成有漏洞產生的疑慮。我國對於救命寶寶之管制主要是依據人工生殖法，依我國的人工生殖法和實務操作上顯示，我國在實務操作上並不會對健康寶寶與救命寶寶加以區分，兩者皆用相同的流程處理，此部分是否恰當存有很大的爭議，而除了區分爭議外，相關人工生殖機構的審查與分布、人工生殖技術諮詢委員會的任務範疇與相關資訊公開亦容有問題存在，顯示我國相關法制實有改進之必要，方能達到妥善管制降低疑慮的願景。
Savior Sibling is a product of new technology. Due to the possible worries about the binding of the Constitution and ethics, we should control this kind of man-made procreation. The core of this article is how to manage and control Savior Siblings. The article will not only analyze the laws and regulations, but also counsel to relevant organs for the practical operation procedures by telephone or E-mail.
In virtue of a wide influential scope of the Savior Sibling, it has aroused many disputes and arguments, even at the stage of embryo, e.g., what degree of the protection measures we should take to protect the embryo? To adopt mankind model, cell model, or respected model? In spite of the arguments it aroused in protection degree, it also aroused many arguments and disputes in the Constitution, such as humanity dignity, life right, self-decided right of procreation, health right of the saved person, and gene discrimination, etc… How we can keep various rights balance, and eliminate possible disputes and arguments?
All of the above highlight the importance of the Savior Sibling. We should set up a perfect and appropriate management procedure to reduce possible social arguments and disputes. How does Taiwan manage the Savior Sibling? Our country does not set up a specific law to manage and control the Savior Sibling, and it does not regulate the management procedures clearly. This will arouse the worries to possible flaws and loopholes in laws. The management of the Savior Sibling in Taiwan mainly relies on man-made procreation. According to the analysis of our man-made procreation method and the practical operation, our country will not differentiate the healthy Baby with the Savior Sibling in practice. The same treatment procedures are applied to both of these two kinds of babies. There is a very big dispute and argument on the appropriateness. In spite of the differentiation arguments, there are also problems lying in the inspection and distribution of relevant man-made procreation organs, the business scope of man-made procreation technology counseling commission, and the publication of relevant information. All of them show that it is necessary to improve relevant laws and regulations. Only by doing so can we perfectly manage the Savior Sibling and gain less worries. |
