中大機構典藏-NCU Institutional Repository-提供博碩士論文、考古題、期刊論文、研究計畫等下載:Item 987654321/60484
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 80990/80990 (100%)
Visitors : 41652710      Online Users : 1690
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.lib.ncu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/60484


    Title: 多準則決策之應用-以雷射半導體產業為例
    Authors: 陸重生;Lu,Chung-Sheng
    Contributors: 工業管理研究所在職專班
    Keywords: 雷射二極體;多準則決策;替代方案;Laser diode;multi-criteria decision making;alternatives
    Date: 2013-07-15
    Issue Date: 2013-08-22 11:38:32 (UTC+8)
    Publisher: 國立中央大學
    Abstract: 確定性環境、風險環境和不確定性環境是決策者在做決策評估方案時,首要考量的因素。決策者不怕知道風險的機率為何,因為雖然不知道事件會發生的結果,但是有辦法了解事件結果的各種可能性。決策者就怕掌握不到未來的結果的資訊,無法知道所有可能發生的結果。因此,決策者在做決策時,對於其所考慮的決策環境必須掌握清楚並且要能有效率及正確的使用決策機制,才不至於浪費時間又做錯決定。
    本研究使用多準則決策(Multi-criterion Decision Making
    MCDM)中的量化準則評估法之方法,並整理參考相關的文獻,依據決策理論中多準則決策的方法,採用大中取大(maximax)、小中取大(maximin)、大中取小遺憾(minimax regret)、Hurwicz、Laplace及期望值等準則作為理論基礎,深入探討這些方法的特性及使用時機,以發展出企業的方案決定評估準則。藉由一實際個案,以不同的情境條件及企業方案,配合運用多準則決策模式為評估方法,以找出最適合的決策方案。本研究結果顯示,個案公司經由多準則決策之模式為評估方法,可有效決定適用之企業方案,並對即將使用多準則決策方法的後進者提供具體的指南,及對後續研究提出建議,作為其他公司遇到相似情況時的決策方法。
    The environment of uncertainty, risk and uncertainty are the primary consideration factors of evaluating alternatives when decision makers are in decision making. Decision makers are not afraid to know the probability of risk, because they could know the probability of each result though they don’t know what result will come out. Decision makers are afraid of not knowing anything about future and about possible result. Therefore, decision makers should know fully well about the decision environment and to use decision-making method effectively and correctly, otherwise they will not only waste of time but also make wrong decisions.
    In light of this, several theories of the rule of quantitative evaluation methods and multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methgods are quoted in this paper. By using the Maximax, Minimax, Minimax Regret, Hurwicz, Laplace and Expected Value methods from MCDM, this paper could summarize these methods to provide decision makers how to optimize decisions and help enterprises to develop the assessment of decision plan. This paper, by structuring a decision problem into various actions under consideration and states of nature describing, with the introducing of MCDM models, tried to find an appropriate alternatives. As a result, by using MCDM methods as the assessment plan on projects, the company mentioned in this paper could solve their decision problems effectively. And, this paper could also give instructions of decision-making to the followers and companies in similar situation they might have in the future.
    Appears in Collections:[Executive Master of Industrial Management] Electronic Thesis & Dissertation

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML856View/Open


    All items in NCUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    社群 sharing

    ::: Copyright National Central University. | 國立中央大學圖書館版權所有 | 收藏本站 | 設為首頁 | 最佳瀏覽畫面: 1024*768 | 建站日期:8-24-2009 :::
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 隱私權政策聲明