English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 65275/65275 (100%)
Visitors : 20908361      Online Users : 247
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.lib.ncu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/62812


    Title: 人與「此在」─現象學於謝勒與海德格之變奏與轉化;Person and Dasein: The Variation and Transformation of Phanomenology by Scheler and Heidegger
    Authors: 孫雲平
    Contributors: 國立中央大學哲學研究所
    Keywords: 哲學
    Date: 2013-12-01
    Issue Date: 2014-03-17 14:04:01 (UTC+8)
    Publisher: 行政院國家科學委員會
    Abstract: 研究期間:10208~10307;Following my serial studies of exploring to the sources of Heidegger’s thought, this project tries to examine the influences of Scheler’s philosophy on Heidegger’s thought. Aside from the phenomenological method offered by Husserl and the content of ontology and teleology of Aristotle, the earlier contemporary Scheler had influences upon Heidegger’s philosophy. As for my personal primary understanding, besides his more substantial inspiration of phenomenological methodology than Husserl’s, Scheler also provided the essential implications to Heidegger’s, namely, to treat the concrete person as the subject matter of phenomenology, instead of Husserl’s phenomenology’s core, “consciousness”. Moreover, Scheler’s influence included the converting Heidegger from the adviser of his dissertation, Rickert, as well as the Neo-Kantianism of epistemological approach to the focusing on emotion and situation of man [Dasein, in Heidegger’s term] as the primordial way to understand and perceive the life world and things in the environment. However, there exist some divergences between them which mainly lie in the following: Heidegger did not agree with the naming his philosophy as philosophical anthropology. He regards his philosophy as fundamental ontology of Dasein; that is, he thinks that his philosophy is based on ontology, rather than no matter what kind of anthropology, psychology, or ethics…etc. Starting from the new moments and approaches that Scheler and Heidegger poured into the phenomenology’s development after Husserl and are distinguished from Husserl’s, this study thus tries to explore the relation between Scheler’s and Heidegger’s thought, the commonness and differences of the both.
    Relation: 財團法人國家實驗研究院科技政策研究與資訊中心
    Appears in Collections:[哲學研究所] 研究計畫

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML400View/Open


    All items in NCUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    社群 sharing

    ::: Copyright National Central University. | 國立中央大學圖書館版權所有 | 收藏本站 | 設為首頁 | 最佳瀏覽畫面: 1024*768 | 建站日期:8-24-2009 :::
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback  - 隱私權政策聲明