English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 78111/78111 (100%)
Visitors : 30561385      Online Users : 593
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version

    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.lib.ncu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/63597

    Title: 衡量半導體零組件通路商之相對經營績效
    Authors: 沈瑞程;Shen,Jui-Cheng
    Contributors: 企業管理學系碩士在職專班
    Keywords: 半導體零組件通路商;標竿學習;資料包絡分析法;Benchmark Learning;Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA);Semiconductor Component Distributor
    Date: 2007-01-19
    Issue Date: 2014-05-08 15:12:41 (UTC+8)
    Publisher: 國立中央大學
    Abstract: 半導體市場隨著中國市場的蓬勃發展而呈現戰線逐漸拉長,戰局不斷擴大的情勢,這使得能協調上游半導體供應商與下游電子產品製造商的半導體零組件通路商之重要性日益突顯。雖然有數百家公司或多或少扮演著通路商的角色,但是真正能夠持績發展,深耕半導體通路領域而符合國內外供應商、客戶所需的,並且經營績效突出的,到底是何種性質的通路商呢?
    ;With the prosperous growth of semiconductor market in China, it is found that the supply chain is getting longer and harder to maintain. Therefore, semiconductor component distributor becomes more and more important and indispensable in this field. Today, there are more than hundred companies which play as distributors, but what kind of distributors could really satisfy both vendors and manufacturers?
    In this research, raw data of each distributor is collected from public “Market Observation Post System” which is held by “Taiwan Stock Exchange Corporation”. DEA method is adopted to evaluate all distributors’ performance in order to realize the relative positions for all being-estimated distributors. Furthermore, this research tries to classify each distributor’s management status by 5-year-long performance change. Then, using the conclusions we have from above, this research studies each distributor’s financial characteristics in order to look for if there is any remarkable difference between benchmark and non-benchmark distributors.
    Here summarize the conclusions of this research:
    1.Regarding to management performance, this research shows that good performance distributors are getting stronger and vice versa. The benchmark group includes 3 companies, which are Supreme, Edom and PCT. The members of fall-behind group are Frontek, SAC and Zenitron.
    2.This research classifies distributors into six types by Malmquist Productivity Index and CCR. Among these six groups, PCT, whose scale of asset is the smallest, is the one with the best performance. However, some distributors with far bigger asset than other competitors are not good enough as people think, like WPI and Yosun.
    3.Getting further to analyze the root causes which could affect distributors’ performance, this research finds that benchmark distributors are doing excellent on following aspects: Current Ratio/Quick Ratio and Inventory Turnover Ratio/Days-Inventory Turn.
    4.To analyze the performance fall-behind distributors, it shows they are poor at following aspects: A/R Turnover Ratio/Average Collection Period, ROA, ROE, and Pre-Tax Income Capital ratio.
    5.This research shows that there is no obvious difference between benchmark and non-benchmark distributors on following aspects: Company Setup Duration and Employee on-job Duration. It concludes that old distributors or distributors with long on-job employees are not certainly with better performance.
    Appears in Collections:[企業管理學系碩士在職專班] 博碩士論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat

    All items in NCUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    社群 sharing

    ::: Copyright National Central University. | 國立中央大學圖書館版權所有 | 收藏本站 | 設為首頁 | 最佳瀏覽畫面: 1024*768 | 建站日期:8-24-2009 :::
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 隱私權政策聲明