English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 73032/73032 (100%)
Visitors : 23248298      Online Users : 378
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version

    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.lib.ncu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/68526

    Title: 以 Aumann and Serrano 新風險指標重新檢視基金投資策略之績效;Measuring the Performace of Investment Strategies with a New Index of Riskiness
    Authors: 楊峻瑋;Yang,Jun-wei
    Contributors: 財務金融學系
    Keywords: 共同基金;Aumann and Serrano;Foster and Hart;dollar cost averaging;lump-sum investing;buy and hold
    Date: 2015-08-05
    Issue Date: 2015-09-23 11:58:15 (UTC+8)
    Publisher: 國立中央大學
    Abstract: 本文觀察一般投資大眾易於操作的投資策略,分別計算並比較「定期定額」、「單筆總額」、「買進持有」投資策略所涉的風險和風險調整後績效。藉由標準差以及含有「隨機優越」概念之新風險指標衡量風險,採用 Foster and Hart (2009) 修正 Aumann and Serrano (2008) 的公式,運用 sharpe ratio、sortino ratio、upside potential ratio、EPM 等風險調整後績效指標加以比較。首先,發現定期定額降低平均持有成本的效果並不明顯,只有當股價趨勢往下的時刻才能有效發揮降低平均持有成本。接著,若將投資期間分成1、3年,無論是哪種投資期間或投資標的,定期定額績效最差;且若將投資年限延長至3年,定期定額的風險指標將變成三種投資策略之中最高。最後,我們把基金依照新風險指標與標準差排序後形成高風險、低風險投資組合進行風險與績效比較,結果顯示三種投資策略依照新風險指標值排序與標準差相同,但投資策略的績效以新風險指標形成投資組合較為優秀。;Based on Foster and Hart (2009) adjusted Aumann and Serrano index, we calculate a new index of riskness to compare three investment strategies, namely, dollar cost averaging, lump sum investing, and buy and hold policies. We examined the riskiness and risk-adjusted performance of three investment strategies with the standard deviation and a new index of riskiness which encompasses the stochastic dominance concept. First, we find that the dollar cost averaging was not obvious in reducing the average holding cost. Only when the stock price falls, the dollar cost averaging could effectively reduce the average holding cost. Moreover, no matter which policies or investment targets or period, dollar cost averaging′s performance was worst. The risk of dollar cost averaging turns out to be the highest among the three investment strategies when the investment horizon extended to 3 years. Finally, based on the fund-sorted high-risk and low-risk investment portfolios in accordance with the new index of riskness and standard deviation, we find the performance of the low-risk portfolio formed by new index of riskness to be the best.
    Appears in Collections:[財務金融研究所] 博碩士論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat

    All items in NCUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    社群 sharing

    ::: Copyright National Central University. | 國立中央大學圖書館版權所有 | 收藏本站 | 設為首頁 | 最佳瀏覽畫面: 1024*768 | 建站日期:8-24-2009 :::
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback  - 隱私權政策聲明