規劃合宜的時程網圖對於營建工程而言，無論是設計階段或是施工執行階段都能幫助專案順利的進行；而在專案完成後，若有發生爭議時，經核准的時程網圖亦經常為爭議處理時的佐證資料。然而，由於國內承包商程度參差不齊，再加上國內各工程主辦機關對於時程網圖審查，往往僅有原則性的審查條件、或是說明性質的審查條文，並無明確之標準來規定審查人員如何審查承包商所提送之時程網圖。因此，審查之工程師常以自身經驗來判斷時程網圖是否正確，或是交由監造單位執行審查，常導致無法順利檢視出時程網圖不合理或是錯誤之處。本研究綜整國內各工程主辦機關之相關時程網圖審查機制和流程，分析目前各機關針對時程網圖審查所制定之作法或是審查標準，並參考國外針對時程管理或是網圖審查之相關研究，進而提出29項時程網圖審查準則，同時說明執行時程網圖審查時的應審查項目與審查方式供機關參考，以補足目前普遍不齊全之審查標準，使機關在審查承包商所提送之時程網圖時便能有所依據，避免時程網圖出現不合理之情形，以利日後提升國內時程管理的水準。;A well-planned schedule by the contractor is very important for a construction project because that schedule is the basis of project success in its design and construction stages and would usually be a baseline schedule, if it is proved by the owner, used in schedule-related disputes. However, the scheduling capability of contractors in Taiwan is diversified and the client usually uses certain general review criteria to evaluate the schedule submit by the contractor. Namely, the quality of schedule prepared by the contractor is not good and there is no clear and appropriate schedule review criteria used by the client. Occasionally, the reviewer in the client commonly uses his/her experience to perform necessary schedule review and even pass the duty to the construction inspector. This situation commonly results in that there are some errors or appropriate outcomes in a proved baseline schedule. This study collects available review mechanism and procedures in professional engineering entities in Taiwan as well as some outcomes from previous studies to analyze suitable review items in Taiwan. For solving the problem of available schedule review criteria being uncompleted, this study establishes a baseline schedule review principle that contains 29 review criteria consisting of required and optional criteria. For each criterion, detailed review items and related review methods are provided. Based on real cases examination and expert interview, the outcomes of this study can be used to assist schedule reviewers to perform necessary review works. Hopefully the study results can improve the quality of schedule development and review, and increase the performance of schedule management in the future.
