English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 69937/69937 (100%)
Visitors : 23246782      Online Users : 431
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.lib.ncu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/72556


    Title: 綠建築標章精進策略探討 ─以公有建築物為例─;A suggestion of improving strategy in Green Building Label -Take public construction as an example-
    Authors: 陳建霖;Chen, Chien-Lin
    Contributors: 土木工程學系在職專班
    Keywords: 綠建築;公有建築;綠建築評估計分表;green building;public constructions;green building evaluation scorecard
    Date: 2016-11-11
    Issue Date: 2017-01-23 15:44:58 (UTC+8)
    Publisher: 國立中央大學
    Abstract: 摘要
    建築與人類生活本就密不可分,但過去建築物長期被認為是環境污染
    的最大來源。近年來因環保意識抬頭以及技術、建材的進步,並且在台灣
    政府的大力推動下,無論是在建築領域或日常生活,綠建築早已融入其中,
    甚至蔚為主流。即便如此,我國的綠建築發展並未就此停下腳步,反而是
    不斷追求更上一層樓的嶄新階段。
    本論文以2007 年取得綠建築標章的4 項公有建築物為例,首先取得
    2007 年版評估計分表,再以2015 年最新版之計分方式進行試算後,比較2
    版本分數之落差,同時探究造成分數落差的主因,藉此提出相關改善措施
    及提升之建議,作為綠建築標章之精進策略。
    由本研究結果可知,2015 年版在權重系數差異調整上,特別重視「電」
    和「水」2 大基礎資源,在綠建築標章取得上更能呼應綠營建永續發展之展
    望。而為使綠建築更為精進,除可在設計階段加強各項指標的規劃外,更
    應重視後續使用之維護管理,並且盡可能以自然、天然的方式達到各項指
    標的效果,提升建築物品質,達到永續經營的目標。;Abstract
    Construction and human life have always been inseparable. For years,
    buildings were considered the primary source of pollutants to the environment.
    In recent years, due to awakening of eco-consciousness and improved building
    techniques and materials, plus the promotion of the government in Taiwan,
    green building has been incorporated in construction and in everyday life. In fact,
    it has become the mainstream. However, development of green building in the
    country has not stopped because of such an accomplishment. Instead, people
    continue to pursue better techniques, hoping to achieve a higher level.
    In this paper, four public constructions awarded the Green Building Label
    in 2007 are applied as examples. Initially, the scorecard used in 2007 was
    obtained and the scoring system for 2015 was adopted to recalculate the scores
    and compare the differences between the two editions. At the same time, the
    main causes of such differences are analyzed to come up with suggestions for
    improving related measures that are taken into consideration when the Green
    Building Label is awarded.
    The outcome of this study indicates that when the weighting coefficients
    were adjusted for the 2015 edition, electricity and water, the two fundamental
    resources, were particularly emphasized. The intention was to assure awarding
    of the Green Building Label could really comply with the expectation for
    sustainable development in construction. To improve green building techniques,
    besides establishing stricter indicators during the design stage, maintenance and
    management after buildings are put to use must also be valued. In addition,
    natural approaches have to be adopted to meet various indicators to upgrade the
    quality of buildings and achieve the goal of sustainable management.
    Appears in Collections:[土木工程學系碩士在職專班] 博碩士論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML381View/Open


    All items in NCUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    社群 sharing

    ::: Copyright National Central University. | 國立中央大學圖書館版權所有 | 收藏本站 | 設為首頁 | 最佳瀏覽畫面: 1024*768 | 建站日期:8-24-2009 :::
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback  - 隱私權政策聲明