English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 67783/67783 (100%)
Visitors : 23072461      Online Users : 460
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version

    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.lib.ncu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/77340

    Title: 論我國內線交易罪刑度之妥適性;Adequacy of Punishments for Insider Trading
    Authors: 劉羽芯;Liou, Yu-Shin
    Contributors: 產業經濟研究所
    Keywords: 內線交易;證交法第157-1條;證交法第171條;重刑化;insider trading;Securities Exchange Act article 157-1;Securities Exchange Act article 171;Heavy penalization
    Date: 2018-07-20
    Issue Date: 2018-08-31 14:34:14 (UTC+8)
    Publisher: 國立中央大學
    Abstract: 隨著證券交易的普及,以及網際網路發展日新月異,內線交易成為最常見的金融犯罪,各國均致力於防止內線交易之發生,以鞏固其證券交易市場之流通,我國承襲美國法,將內線交易罪制定於證券交易法第157條之1,並於同法第171條規定了刑事責任。
    ;With the growing popularity of securities trading and the rapid development of the Internet, the insider trading becomes the most common financial crime. In order to consolidate the circulation of its securities trading market, the entire world is committed to preventing the occurrence of insider trading. Taiwan inherited U.S. law, put the offence of insider trading into Article 157-1 of the Securities Exchange Act and criminal liability is stipulated in Article 171 of the same law.
    According to Securities Exchange Act article 171 :「A person who has committed any of the following offenses shall be punished with imprisonment for not less than three years and not more than ten years, and in addition thereto, a fine of not less than NT$10 million and not more than NT$200 million may be imposed: paragraph 1 or 2 of Article 157-1. 」and Paragraph 2「Where the amount gained by the commission of an offense under the preceding paragraph is NT$100 million or more, a sentence of imprisonment for not less than seven years shall be imposed, and in addition thereto a fine of not less than NT$25 million and not more than NT$500 million may be imposed .」
    Such a high degree of punishment allows the writer to wonder if the viciousness of insider trading crime is so high that it must be stopped with such drastic measures. Further, under such severe punishment, whether there is no loophole in Securities Exchange Act to prevent insider trading crime? Whether the protection of the defendant’s human rights is complete? All of this article will explore. Regarding the issues above, this article first analyzes the relevant regulations and theories of preventing insider trading in the United States. And review the relevant provisions of Securities Exchange Act in Taiwan. Taking “Taiwan Land Development Corporation insider trading” for example, to highlight the problems stipulated by the current Securities Exchange Act in Taiwan. Next, the eighth chapter deeply discusses whether the use of heavy penalization as a means can achieve the purpose of legislators. Finally, in the ninth chapter, suggestions for amendments are proposed.
    Appears in Collections:[產業經濟研究所] 博碩士論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat

    All items in NCUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    社群 sharing

    ::: Copyright National Central University. | 國立中央大學圖書館版權所有 | 收藏本站 | 設為首頁 | 最佳瀏覽畫面: 1024*768 | 建站日期:8-24-2009 :::
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback  - 隱私權政策聲明