軟體開發團隊在競爭激烈且使用者需求多變的環境中，需要迅速了解需求內容並進行相應的修改。因此，軟體開發敏捷性以能持續滿足不斷變化的使用者需求的能力而受到重視。目前的文獻對於軟體開發團隊是否能夠透過學習來影響軟體開發敏捷性相對匱乏。因此，本研究基於組織學習理論，探討團隊雙元學習對軟體開發敏捷性的影響，團隊透過雙元學習去掌握變化並適應變化，藉由探索性學習去獲取新知識，並透過利用性學習改進現有知識和技能。此外，團隊需要透過反思及時調整內部運行機制，制定適應性策略，以有效並高效率應對客戶需求的變化。 綜合前述，本研究基於組織學習理論建構研究模型，探討團隊雙元學習與軟體開發敏捷性之間的關係，並且透過團隊反思調節。本研究採用問卷調查法收集樣本，共回收123份有效配對問卷，並以偏最小平方法 (Partial Least Square) 對資料做分析並檢視假說。研究結果顯示，團隊雙元學習中的團隊探索性學習與軟體開發敏捷性之軟體團隊回應廣泛性以及回應效率呈現正向關係；團隊利用性學習與軟體團隊回應廣泛性呈現正向關係，並且透過團隊反思正向調節兩者之間的關係。此外，本研究亦針對不顯著的假說做進一步的解釋，並提出研究過程中的限制以及未來研究方向。 ;In a competitive and rapidly changing environment with diverse user demands, software development teams need to quickly understand the requirements and make corresponding modifications. Therefore, software development agility enables teams to continuously meet evolving user needs and is highly valued. However, existing literature lacks sufficient exploration of whether software development teams can influence their agility through learning. Hence, this study, grounded in organizational learning theory, aims to investigate the impact of team ambidextrous learning on software development agility. Teams utilize ambidextrous learning to comprehend and adapt to changes, acquiring new knowledge through exploratory learning, and improving existing knowledge and skills through exploitative learning. Additionally, teams need to reflect and adjust their internal operations, formulate adaptive strategies, and effectively respond to changing customer demands. Based on the above, this study constructs a research model based on organizational learning theory to explore the relationship between team ambidextrous learning and software development agility, with team reflexivity as a moderator. The study collects data using a questionnaire survey, obtaining 123 valid matched responses. The collected data are analyzed by Partial Least Squares (PLS). The results indicate that team exploratory learning has a positive relationship with the software team response extensiveness and response efficiency. Team exploitative learning demonstrates a positive relationship with the software team response extensiveness, and team reflexivity positively moderates this relationship. Moreover, this study provides further explanations for non-significant hypotheses and highlights limitations and future research directions.
