| 摘要: | 在現今科技發達的環境下，營建產業對各種技術的採用不斷增加，因此BIM的應用也隨之增加。但是，如果對 BIM 效益評估技術的認識不足，則可能會阻礙組織與專案中 BIM 的應用。過去有少部分研究人員在專案層次討論具體的 BIM 效益評估方法，但僅對於特定利益相關者有助益，實務應用上仍有相當的限制。本研究旨在有系統性地分析BIM應用有關研究中效益評估技術的現狀，釐清未來的研究需求，並建構適用於執行BIM效益評估的評估架構和指南，以利提供預計執行 BIM 效益評估者參考。本研究採用以文獻分析為基礎的研究方法，首先參照 PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) 模式，從 WoS、Scopus 和 Google Scholar 資料庫中取得文獻，然後採用結合文獻計量分析（定量分析）與系統性文獻分析（定性審查）的混合方法進行分析，以建構 BIM 效益評估架構與指引。經本研究分析後發現，在分析的年期中，論文數量近年來沒有增加。最後本研究也以分析的文獻為基礎，提出BIM 效益評估架構與指引，以利日後可以參考應用。本研究認為BIM效益評估仍需更多的研究，以利未來可以提供更有用的工具，以及實務應用後的經驗學習，讓BIM使用者能夠確實獲利於BIM的應用。;In the current technologically advanced environment, the adoption of various technology in the construction industry is increasing, thus the implementation of BIM shall also increase. But, if there is poor awareness regarding BIM benefit evaluation techniques, then it might discourage the implementation of BIM in the organization and project. In the past, few researchers have discussed the BIM benefit evaluation at the project level which is more specific and helps only a specific stakeholder. Practical implementation is limited. This research is aiming to systematically analyze the current status of benefits evaluation in BIM implementation research (publications), identify future research requirements, and develop an applicable evaluation framework and instruction on BIM benefit evaluation. This study adopts literature review-based research, beginning with the acquisition of publications from the WoS, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) model guideline, followed by a mixed-review approach that combines bibliometric analysis, often known as quantitative review, and systematic analysis, also known as a qualitative review to develop a framework of BIM benefit evaluation validated through expert interview. The results show that the number of publications in this scope is not increasing in recent years. Finally, an applicable BIM benefit evaluation framework and guidelines were built as the outcome of this research. The framework contains several scenarios of approaches for conducting BIM benefit evaluation from the perspectives of the designer, contractor, and owner. This study concluded that more researches and more practical implementations of BIM benefit evaluation are needed, those provide more useful tools and lessons learned in evaluating their BIM implementation cases for BIM users who deserve BIM implementation. |
