摘要(英) |
Enterprises in order to response the challenge of environment fast change, must quickly reaction customer demand, and get more competition advantage than other competitors in the marke. In addition, enterprises manage to internationalization, the competition that is faced is global, a lot of enterprises toward the transnational type of operation. The scale of enterprises and range dealing in with enterprises increase greatly to need expanding gradually, so the more demand for the improved enterprise’’s process merger and function of information system. Not only understand all resources and operation conditions of the supplier and customer, still need to combine all resources, becomes an intact supply chain way, have more smoothly communicates with supplier and customer, reduce supply the chain and stock cost entirely, short output time, increase product category, accurate delivery date, fine customer service , improve quality, accurate coordinate global demand, supply and produce effectively. Therefor, enterprise must promote the ability to transmit and producing correct information immediately inside. Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP ) is a result under such era in enterprises.
ERP develops and enters ripe stage ownly so far. Every manufacturer marks the system is the best model of practice, the quality of the software is divided difficultly nice or bad. So the service quality that ERP system supplier offers, and enterprises will usually trust the experienced professional consultants to help them, The purpose is to hope consultants communicate between ERP system supplier and enterprise. In order to make to the greatest efficiency of system. So ERP system supplier’’s service quality and service quality of the consultant firm, become key of successful factors.
This research use Parasuraman, et al. ( 1988) sum up five factors of service quality , to measure a system supplier service quality and consultant service quality. Using DeLone & McLean (1992) propose information system success modle six factors to of measure system performance improve degree, and using Structural Equation Structure (SEM) to analysis. In order to understand the causality relation between service quality and system performance improve degree, and develop out full model of service quality and system performance improve degree. The result shows that service quality and performance improve degree of the system and have causality relation, show that the higher service quality is and better improvement performance degree is. |
參考文獻 |
一、中文部分
1. 王天賜,「衡量ERP供應廠商服務品質之成功模式」,國立中央大學企業管
理研究所碩士論文,民國九十二年。
2. 王立志,「系統化運籌與供應鏈管理」,初版,台中:滄海書局,民國88年。
3. 吳琮璠、謝清佳,「資訊管理─理論與實務」,台北:智勝文化事業有限公司,民國八十九年。
4. 朱麗芬,「國內企業導入ERP系統之模式探討-以IC製造業為例」,國立政
治大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文。
5. 邱皓正,「結構方程式」,雙業書廊,民國九十二年。
6. 國立中央大學管理學院ERP中心,「ERP企業資源規劃導論」,第四版,民
國九十四年。
7. 陳順宇,「多變量分析」,第三版,華泰書局。
8. 陳麗品,「ERP顧問服務品質與系統滿意度之研究」,國立中央大學資訊管
理研究所碩士論文,民國九十一年。
9. 曾靜萱,「發展組織研發能耐與研發績效之因果模式」,國立中央大學企業管理學系碩士論文,民國九十年。
10. 資訊市場情報中心(MIC),「2002-2005年全球ERP市場規模分析」,資策會,http://mic.iii.org.tw/soft/default.asp,ERP市場規模研究查詢(2002年11月)。
11. 資訊市場情報中心(MIC),「我國系統整合市場現況與發展趨勢」,資策會,http://mic.iii.org.tw/soft/default.asp,ERP市場金額研究查詢(2000年03月)。
12. 資訊市場情報中心(MIC),「企業電子化軟體技術應用發展趨勢」,資策會,http://mic.iii.org.tw/soft/default.asp,ERP定義查詢(2000年06月)。
二、英文部分
1. Bagozzi. R.P. (1988), Causal Models in Marking. New York: Wiley. Laughlin, S. P., “An ERP Game Plan,” Journal of Business Strategy, Vol. 20, Iss. 1, pp. 32-37.
2. Benchmarking Partners, Inc. (1999), Implementation Research Study.
3. Bingi, P., Maneesh, K. S., and Jayanth, K. G. (1999), “Critical Issues Affecting an ERP Implementation,” Information Systems Management, Summer: pp.7-14.
4. Churchill (1979), G.A., “A paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Concept,” Journal of Marketing Research Vol. 16, pp64-73.
5. Davenport, T. H. (1998), “Putting the Enterprise into the Enterprise System,” Harvard Business Review, Vol. 76, Iss. 4, pp.121-131.
6. DeLone, W. H. & McLean, E. R.(1992), “Information Systems Success: the Quest for the Dependent Variable,” Information Systems Research, Vol.3, No.1, pp60-95.
7. DeLone, W. H. & McLean, E. R. (2003), “ The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update.” Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 19, No. 4, pp9-30.
8. Deloitte Cousulting, ERP’s Second Wave., 1999.
9. Galasso, J. (1998), “Business Goals, End-Users Must Drive Information Systems Selection,” Pulp & Paper, Vol. 72, No. 11, pp. 50-59.
10. Gould, L. (1997) , “Planning and Scheduling Today’s Automative Enterprises,” Automative Manufacturing & Production, Vol. 109, Iss. 4 , pp.62-66.
11. Hair,J .F., Anderson R.E., Tatham RL., and Black, W.C.(1995),Multivariate Data Analysis (5ed), New Jersey: Reentice Hall.
12. Holland, C. and Light, B. (1999), “A Critical Success Factors Model for ERP Implementation,” IEEE Software, Vol. 16, Iss. 3, pp.30-36.
13. Kettinger, W.J., and Lee, C.C. (1994), "Perceived Service Quality and User Satisfaction with the Information Services Function,” Decision Sciences, Vol.25, pp737-765
14. Kotler, P., Ang, S.W., Leong, S.M., and Tan, C.T., Marketing Management: AN Asian Perspective, Prentice Hall, 1996.
15. Laudon; K.C., and Laudon, J.P. (1998), “New Approaches to Organization and Technology, ” Management Information System Prentice Hall, 5th Ed. London.
16. Laughlin, S. P. (1999). “An ERP Game Plan,” Journal of Business Strategy, Jan-Feb: pp32-27.
17. Li, C. (1999). “ERP package: what’s next? Information Systems Management,” Summer:31-35.
18. Mabert, V.A., Soni, A., Venkataraman, M.A.( 2000), “Enterprise Resource Planning:Survey of US Manufacturing Firms.” Production and Inventory Management, Vol. 41, No. 2, pp.52-58
19. Parasuraman, A., L. L. Berry, and V. A. Zeithaml(1991), "Understanding Customer Expectations of Service," Sloan Management Review, pp.39-48.
20. Yi, Y.(1990), "A Critical Review of Consumer Satisfaction," in Zeithaml, V (Ed.), Review of Marketing, Chicago, IL: American Marketing Association, pp.68-123.
21. Zeithaml, V.A., Berry, L.L., and Parasuraman, A. (1988), “Communication and Control Process in the Delivery of Service Quality,” Journal of Marketing, Vol. 52. No. 2, pp35-48 |