參考文獻 |
中文參考文獻
1. 樊景立、鄭伯壎(2000)。「華人組織的家長式領導: 一項文化觀點的分析」,本土心理學研究,13,126-180。
2. 姜定宇、丁 捷、林伶瑾(2012)。「家長式領導與部屬效能:信任主管與不信任主管的仲介效果」,中華心理學刊,54,269-291。
3. 林淑姬、樊景立、吳靜吉、司徒達賢(1994)。「薪酬公平、程式公正與 組織承諾、組織公民行為關係之研究」,管理評論,13(2),87-107。
4. 王少傑(2019)。「中國家長式領導模式演化分析」,領導學研究,8,55-59。
5. 鄭伯壎(1995)。「家長權威與領導行為之關係:一個台灣民營企業主持人的個案研究」,中央研究院民族學研究所集刊,79,119-173。
6. 鄭伯壎(1996)。家長權威與領導行為之關係探討(二)。國家科學委員會專題研究報告(報告編號:NSC85-2413-H002-005)。臺北,行政院國家科學委員會。
7. 鄭伯壎、周麗芳、樊景立(2000)。「家長式領導量表,三元模式的建構與測量」,本土心理學研究,14,3-64。
8. 鄭伯壎、黃敏萍、周麗芳(2002)。「家長式領導及其效能:華人企業團隊的證據」,華人心理學報,3(1),85-112。
9. 鄭伯壎、周麗芳、黃敏萍、樊景立、彭泗清(2003)。「家長式領導的三元模式:中國大陸企業組織的證據」,本土心理學研究,20,209-250。
10. 吳宗祐(2008)。「主管威權領導與部屬的工作滿意度與組織承諾:信任的中介歷程與情緒智力的調節效果」,本土心理學研究,30,3-63。
11. 王華瑞、衛利華、王祥兵(2019)。「諮詢網路中心性對員工創新行為的曲線行為:威權領導的調節作用」,中外管理,4,82-85。
12. 張超、王安民(2019)。「家長式領導對團隊凝聚力的影響-差序氛圍的仲介作用」,現代管理科學,9,87-89。
13. 楊中芳(1988)。價值變遷與送禮行為。見楊國樞(主編):中國人的心理,386-388。臺北,桂冠圖書公司。
英文參考文獻
1. Aiken, L. S., West, S. G., & Reno, R. R. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Sage.
2. Brislin, R. W. (1980). Translation and content analysis of oral and written materials. Methodology, 389-444.
3. Cable, D. M. & Judge, T. A. (1996). Person organization fit, job choice decisions, and organizational entry. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67, 294-311.
4. Kristof, A. L. (1996). Person-organization fit: An integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurement, and implication. Personnel Psychology, 49, 1-49.
5. DiMarco, N. (1974). Supervisor-subordinate life style and interpersonal need compatibilities as determinants of subordinate’s attitudes toward the supervisor. Academy of Management Journal, 17, 575-578.
6. Edwards, J. R., & Parry, M. E. (1993). On the Use of polynomial regression equations as an alternative to difference scores in organizational research. Academy of Management Journal, 36(6), 1577-1613.
7. Edwards, J. R., & Rothbard, N. P. (1999). Work and family stress and well-being: An examination of person-environment fit in the work and family domains. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 77(2), 85-129.
8. French, J. R. P., Jr., Caplan, R. D., & Harrison, R. V. (1982). The mechanisms of job stress and strain. New York, NY: Wiley.
9. Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years:Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 219-247.
10. Griffin, M. A., Neal, A., & Parker, S. K.(2007). A new model of work role performance: Positive behavior in uncertain and interdependent contexts. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 327-347.
11. Hoffman, B.J., Bynum, B.H., Piccolo, R.F., & Sutton, A.W. (2011). Person-organization value congruence: How transformational leaders influence work groupeffectiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 54, 779-796.
12. Jansen K. J. & Kristof-Brown, A. L.(2006). Toward a multi-dimensional theory of person-environment fit. Journal of Managerial Issues, 18(2), 193- 213.
13. Kristof-Brown, A. L., Zimmerman, R. D., & Johnson, E. C. (2005). Consequences of individuals’ fit at work: A meta-analysis of person–job, person– organization, person– group, and person–supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology, 58, 281-342.
14. Kolenko, T. A. & Aldag, R. J. (1989). Congruence perceptions and managerial career/work outcomes: An exploratory analysis. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Academy of Management.
15. Locke, E. A. (1976). The nature and causes of job satisfaction. In M. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, 1297-1350. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
16. Lewin K. (1951). Field theory in social science. In Dorwin Cartwright (Ed.), Selected theoretical paper. New York: Harper & Brothers.
17. O’ Reilly, C.A., Chatman, J. & Caldwell, D.F. (1991). People and organizational culture: a profile comparison approach to assessing person-organization fit. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 487-516.
18. Spanjol, J., Tam, L., & Tam, V. (2015). Employer-employee congruence inenvironmental values: An exploration of effects on job satisfaction and creativity. Journal of Business Ethics, 130(1), 117-130.
19. Saks, A.M. & Ashforth, B. E. (1997). A longitudinal investigation of the relationships between job information sources, applicant perceptions of fit. Personnel Psychology, 50, 395-426.
20. Taris, R. & Feij, J. A. (2000). Longitudinal examination of the relationship between supplies-values fit and work outcomes. Paper presented at the 15th annual conterence of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, New Orleans, LA.
21. Tepper, B. J., Dimotakis, N., Lambert, L. S., Koopman, J., Matta, F. K., Man Park, H., & Goo, W. (2018). Examining follower responses to transformational leadership from a dynamic, person–environment fit perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 61(4), 1343-1368.
22. Turban, D.B., & Jones, A.P. (1988). Supervisor–subordinate similarity: Types, effects, and mechanisms. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 228-234.
23. Uhl-Bien, M., Riggio, R. E., Lowe, K. B., & Carsten, M. K. (2014). Followership theory: A review and research agenda. The Leadership Quarterly, 25, 83-104.
24. Vancouver, J. B, & Schmitt N. W. (1991). An exploratory examination of person-organization fit:Organizational goal congruence. Personnel Psychology, 44, 333-352.
25. Weiss, D. J., Dawis, R. V., England, G. W., & Lofquist, L. H. (1967). Manual for the Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire. Minneapolis, MN: The University of Minnesota Press.
26. Warr, P. (1994). A conceptual framework for the study of work and mental health. Work & Stress, 8, 84-97.
27. Yukl, G. (1971). Toward a behavioral theory of leadership. Organizational behavior and human performance, 6(4), 414-440. |