English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 70588/70588 (100%)
Visitors : 23114607      Online Users : 588
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.lib.ncu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/10746


    Title: 程序擔責與參考架構訓練對績效考核正確度之影響-動機與能力整合觀點之實驗設計;Improving the Accuracy of Performance rating: The effects of Process Accountability and Frame of Reference Training
    Authors: 陳慧娟;Hui-Chuan Chen
    Contributors: 人力資源管理研究所
    Keywords: 考核程序擔責;考核者動機;參考架構訓練與考核正確度;Leniency and Halo effect.;Process accountability;FOR training;Rater’s motivation;and Rating accuracy
    Date: 2009-05-25
    Issue Date: 2009-09-22 14:06:02 (UTC+8)
    Publisher: 國立中央大學圖書館
    Abstract: 大多數組織的考核系統,缺乏擔責之控制與約束,造成多數考核結果的偏誤。這不但是績效考核失靈的主因,也對後續人力資源管理的影響甚鉅。不同於過去的研究,本研究把焦點放在探討「程序」擔責,對考核者行為產生的影響。另外,試圖驗證參考架構訓練,是否能協助考核者打出更正確的考核結果。最後,本研究整合了考核者動機與能力觀點,了解當考核者同時被要求程序擔責並接受參考架構訓練後,是否對考核品質產生正向的影響。本研究採2(有無承擔考核程序擔責)X 2(考核者訓練)的二因子實驗設計並募集了131名修習組織行為的大學生,對銷售人員進行績效考核。研究結果指出,程序擔責可減緩考核者對考核結果的寬容誤差,並對人際性績效構面之考核正確度有正向顯著的影響。參考架構訓練對各考核構面之考核正確度多有正向顯著的影響。整合考核者之動機與能力觀點,要求考核者程序擔責並接受參考架構訓練後,二者間的交互作用效果對考核正確度亦呈現了正向顯著的影響。最後,本研究針對研究結果進行討論並對後續研究與實務管理提出具體可行的建議。 Most performance appraisal systems lack the force of rater’s accountability. Lacking rater’s accountability leads a lot of rating bias. These results not only affect the function of performance appraisal but also affect the later relevant human resource practices. The main focus of this study is about the relationships between rater’s process accountability , frame of reference training and rating accuracy.One hundred and thirty one raters were assigned to process accountability or no process accountability condition and either to a FOR training or no FOR training condition. Results showed that when raters who were asked to take process accountability,the raters provided less rating leniency compared to raters who were not asked to take process accountability. In training condition, raters who were trained by FOR training provided higher rating accuracy compared to raters who were not trained by FOR training. Process accountability and FOR training both have positive inferences for rating results. The interaction effect of process accountability and FOR training is significant to the rating accuracy.The study results also provide some empirical implications.
    Appears in Collections:[人力資源管理研究所] 博碩士論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat


    All items in NCUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    社群 sharing

    ::: Copyright National Central University. | 國立中央大學圖書館版權所有 | 收藏本站 | 設為首頁 | 最佳瀏覽畫面: 1024*768 | 建站日期:8-24-2009 :::
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback  - 隱私權政策聲明