政府採購法於重大緊急救災工程之效率檢討與革新; Review on Efficiency of Applying Government Procurement Law in Contingent Emergency Rescuing Works and Its Renovation

NCUIR > Engineering College > Graduate Institute of construction engineering > Electronic Thesis & Dissertation > Item 987654321/43547

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.lib.ncu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/43547

Title:	政府採購法於重大緊急救災工程之效率檢討與革新;Review on Efficiency of Applying Government Procurement Law in Contingent Emergency Rescuing Works and Its Renovation
Authors:	張英鈺;Ying-yu Chang
Contributors:	營建管理研究所
Keywords:	重大緊急救災;政府採購法;緊急採購;重大災害;emergency procurement;Government procurements;public infrastructure
Date:	2010-07-30
Issue Date:	2010-12-08 13:44:11 (UTC+8)
Publisher:	國立中央大學
Abstract:	由於近年來氣候環境條件之變遷，重大災害頻傳，而政府機關/構執行緊急救災業務之效率遂成為當前亟需重視之課題。特別是災害應變搶修與重建仍需依據政府採購法之規定辦理；換言之，政府機關/構之救災效率即與是否能善用政府採購法規，息息相關。為因應重大緊急災害之發生，採購法第22條第1項第3款規定：機關/構辦理採購若遇有不可預見之緊急事故，致無法以公開或選擇性招標程序適時辦理，且確有必要者，得採限制性招標辦理；此外，採購法第105條中亦載明在何種條件下，機關/構辦理採購得不受採購法之招標、決標限制，以期達到縮短期程，提高採購效率之目的。依據「政府採購法」第105條規定：『機關辦理下列採購，得不適用本法招標，決標之規定。ㄧ、國家遇有戰爭、天然災害、癘疫或財政經濟上有重大變故，需緊急處置之採購事項。二、人民之生命、身體、健康、財產遭遇緊急危難，需緊急處置之採購事項…前項之採購，有另訂處理辦法予以規範之必要者，其辦法由主辦機關定之』。現今於政府採購法之下，對於緊急救災工程所辦理之所有採購事項雖有可遵循之法規依據，但卻未訂定詳盡且明確之處置辦法，反成為採購承辦人員另一負擔。若未能善用採購法之優勢，反使緊急救災之工程有急事慢辦之疑慮，失去採購法訂定之原意，當然也無法免除受災人民之怨言，實為可惜。本研究針對採購法施行至今之相關案件，對於重大緊急救災工程效率與工程採購發包執行效率作法規面以及制度面之探討。利用工程會所提供民國88年至民國98年所有依採購法第22條第1項第3款以及採購法第105條各項辦理緊急採購之決標案件資料加以篩選，整理出具辦理緊急採購經驗之機關，藉由專家訪談相關辦理經驗彙整出目前緊急救災工程辦理之現況以及影響效率之面向簡述如下：一、政府採購法規；二、行政簽核程序；三、預算編列制度；四、採購承辦人員主觀意識；五、人力資源。而後續輔以問卷調查方式，歸納與分析機關執行重大緊急救災時影響採購效率之主要因素，並針對上述機關執行緊急採購之主要障礙因素，擬定四項具體作法：一、修改「特別採購招標決標處理辦法」第4條、第5條規定；二、成立非常設、任務性之緊急採購專辦編組；三、研擬相關履約激勵機制；四、建立緊急採購作業流程圖。 Due to climate change, disastrous events have repeated laid damages to public infrastructure and tested governments’ ability to react in a meaningful timing. In several occasions, government’s belated counter measures have triggered distrust among the public against government officials as well as politicians. It appears, at least from past experiences, governments in general are slow and inefficient in responding to unexpected events, and they certainly are no match to the competency from the private sector. As a general knowledge, one of major causes for governments’ sloth in action has been attributable to the government procurement process. The aim of this research work is to examine the relevant laws and mandates which set upon government agencies in dealing with government procurements for and of emergencies. Specifically, this study will review past government procurement cases, undertaken under the cause of “emergencies”, and examine the standard employed by agencies in determining whether a given case possesses the nature of an emergency. It will also conduct a nation-wide questionnaire survey and related interviews to verify whether the current laws and mandates relating to procurements for emergencies are sufficient with regards to efficiency. The major findings of this work include: 1. there exists grey area in recognizing a case of procurements in emergency from the standpoint of government agencies; 2. Current laws (i.e. Clause 22 and Clause 105) seem to present overlapping rules for procurement for emergencies; 3. the existing budgetary procedure creates the biggest bottleneck in expediting a procurement case in response to an emergent event; 4. there exists a common lack of incentive to actively seek out ways to facilitate a procurement case; most government agencies lack sufficient skilled personnel in handling government procurements for emergency.
Appears in Collections:	[Graduate Institute of construction engineering] Electronic Thesis & Dissertation

Files in This Item:

File	Description	Size	Format
index.html		0Kb	HTML	998	View/Open

社群 sharing

Loading...