| 摘要: | 常常會有很多人好奇為甚麼有人想要花時間去觀看網路直播，但在這個新興時代，網路直播已經成為一個常見的社會現象，直播未來的趨勢可能會逐漸傾向於直播加上垂直行業(例如：教育直播、電商直播等)，或是直播相關顧問團隊也會因此興起，負責規劃直播的生態圈，因此「直播」值得我們更加深入地去探討。
本研究主要探討觀眾的「風險傾向」在直播主不同的「領導風格」下，「直播主與觀眾之間的關係」，本研究參考過去的文獻，並採取實驗法與問卷法來進行研究，以台灣直播主與其觀眾群為研究對象，觀眾在觀看直播時會不會因為個人不同的「風險傾向」，進而去調節「不同領導風格直播主與觀眾的關係」?
當雙方在建立關係時，直播主永遠不會知道這段關係最後會變成如何，這儼然就像是在一個賭局一樣，必須從不確定中去尋找答案。
研究結果顯示在實驗法下，觀眾的「風險傾向」會調節「直播主領導風格與觀眾的情感性關係和混和性關係」而觀眾的「風險傾向」不會調節「直播主領導風格與觀眾的工具性關係；在問卷法下，觀眾的「風險傾向」會調節「服務型領導風格與觀眾的混和性關係」，其餘則不會有調節效果。
本研究採用實驗法與問卷法兩種，希望能夠擴增網路直播相關研究，本研究將直播主與「領導風格」做結合，將人資的領導理論帶進直播的相關研究中，進而去探討其中的關連性，再來就是不同「領導風格」對不同的「直播主與觀眾的關係」確實會有影響，因此本研究所提出的「領導風格」與「直播主與觀眾的關係」的關聯性能夠提供未來直播相關研究基礎，再來就是以社會交換理論中，關係的互惠性來帶出風險傾向，探討觀眾的「風險傾向」在不同「領導風格」對不同的「直播主與觀眾的關係」是否有調節效果，本研究發現觀眾的「風險傾向」或多或少會去影響不同「領導風格」對不同的「直播主與觀眾的關係」，這對未來相關研究議題也提供了實證的基礎。
;There are often many people wondering why some people want to spend time watching live streaming . In this emerging era, live streaming has become a common social phenomenon and the trend of live streaming may gradually turn to live streaming plus vertical industry(For example, live streaming of education, live streaming of Electronic Business , etc.) , or a team of live streaming consultants will rise up and be responsible for planning the live streaming system. Thus, "live streaming" deserves more in-depth discussion.
This research mainly explores the "risk propensity" of the audience under the different "leadership styles" of the live streamer , and "the relationship between the live streamer and the audience". This research refers to the past literature and adopts experimental methods and questionnaires to conduct research. Taking Taiwan′s live streamers and their audiences as the research objects , will risk propensity of the audiences moderate the audience and steamer in different leadership styles?
When building a relationship, the live streamer will never know how this relationship will eventually become. This is like being in a gambling game, and streamer need to find answer under uncertainty.
The results of this research show that under the experimental method, the audience′s "risk propensity" will moderate the " affective relationship and mixed relationship between the different leadership style and the audiences .And the audience′s "risk propensity" will not moderate the instrumental relationship between the different leadership style and the audiences; under the questionnaire method, the audience′s "risk propensity" will moderate the "mixed relationship between servant leadership style and the audiences", and the rest will not have moderating effects.
This research adopts experimental methods and questionnaires, and hopes to expand research about live streaming. This research combines the live streamer with different "leadership styles" to bring the leadership theory of human capital into the relevant research of live streaming, and then explore the relevance of this relationship.
Different "leadership styles" will have an impact on different " relationship between live streamer and audience". Therefore, the "leadership style" and the " relationship between live streamer and audience" proposed by this research is Relevant .It provides the basis for future live streaming research. In addition, the reciprocity of relationships from the social exchange theory brings out the risk propensity, and explores the risk propensity of the audiences moderate the audience and steamer in different leadership styles? This research discovered that the “risk propensity” of the audience will affect the different “leadership styles” and different “relationship between live streamer and audience”, which also provides basic evidence for future research topics. |
