參與式預算隨在地特性而有著不同發展，我國新北市新店區自2016年起開始採用芝加哥推動議員補助款方式。本研究以新店客家族群促進會三項提案為例，透過質化分析瞭解利害關係人的互動及預算權責之關係。並利用深度訪談法，針對補助之行政首長、推行之民意代表、提案社團代表進行訪談，瞭解三項提案是如何被吸納進一般行政流程，以及三方背後的考量動機。研究發現，由於民意代表與行政部門特殊的互動方式，讓若干提案毋須進入後續民意調查流程，而是由後者認列，吸收為下年度預算政策執行。本研究分析議員模式對於客家族群預算分配的影響，提供未來實務上立法部門與族群代表性機關調整預算政策之參考。;According to local characteristics, participatory budgeting might develop in different ways. Since 2016, Xindian District of New Taipei City started to adopt Chicago’s councillors suggestive fund. Based on three proposals of Xindian Hakka Association, the interaction of stakeholders and the relationship of budget competent authority are analysed via qualitative research. In-depth interview is also used to conduct interviews with directors who had subsidies, legislators who launch the project and the representatives of groups who proposed such project in order to understand how these three proposals were included in general administrative procedures and the potential consideration as well as motivations of the third party. The study discovered that, because of special interactive patterns between legislators and people working in administrative departments, some proposals don’t need to be included in following procedures of public opinion poll; instead, when the latter recognised, they will be implemented as the budget policy for the next year. The impact of legislator models on Hakka budget allocation provides information to legislative departments and population-representative units in order to revise practically the budget policies.
