| 摘要: | 本論文的問題意識循著「火紅年代」與「香港七?年代」神話之間的矛盾和張力，以火紅年代這段「失敗者的」的歷史作為突破點，試圖複雜化從「七?年代神話」而來的「香港人」身份認同。尤其是貫穿於火紅年代討論的「中國問題」，除了是關乎身份認同，有些時候甚至是折射出超越國族身份認同的政治範圍，而應該被理解為第三世界左翼政治對「國族政治」與「左翼政治」該持有什麼關係的問題意識。本論文的在研究框架用了歷史化的方法去書寫火紅年代從1967到1976年的史前史及發展，把並從情感、思想與組織為切入點，研究了六七暴動的左派和極左派、火紅年代中自發毛派、無政府主義者、托派、國粹派、社會派在第一波中文運動、《盤古》、《70年代雙週刊》、珠海事件、保釣運動、反貪污運動、反加價運動、四報聯刊事件、「認識中國」活動中的實踐。同時，論文也拉入了文革造反派、西方新左翼、美國保釣運動等進行參照，以說明火紅年代與其他地方的社會運動及左翼運動的關係。;The myth of the ‘Hong Kong 70s Golden Era’ which glorifies colonial governmentality and the Hongkonger identity which builds upon it have always seem problematic when being juxtaposed with the concept of ‘Fiery Seventies’. The ‘Fiery Seventies’ was a brief period of time during which the Hong Kong post-war baby boomer generation deeply engaged in leftist social movements and enthusiastically discussed about China. By revisiting the history of the ‘Fiery Seventies’, this thesis questions the very assumptions underlying the Hongkonger identity, and discusses the possibilities and difficulties of reinventing Hongkonger identities with Third-World left-wing politics. This thesis delineates the development of the ‘Fiery Seventies’ social movements from 1967-1976, and focuses on the guiding effects of affects, thoughts and organizations in the social movements of pro CCP left-wing-camp, ultra-leftists, autonomous Maoists, anarchists, Trotskyists, student Maoists, and ‘the social faction’. Activism events being discussed include the 1967 Riot, Chinese Language Movement, publications of Pan Ku and 70s Biweekly, Chu Hai College Incident, Baodiao Movement, Anti-Corruption Movement, Anti-Inflation Movement, Joint-Publication Incident, and Know China activities. Through referencing the rebels of Cultural Revolution, the western New Left, and the US Baodiao Movement, the thesis suggests the Fiery Movement was deeply entangled with the global left-wing politics. |
