對於公務員離職後的就業限制「旋轉門條款」，是公務倫理的基本所在，並且經過釋字第637號解釋確認其合憲性。然而，目前我國公務員服務法的「旋轉門條款」是否能夠有效達到立法初衷？是否會過度限制離職公務員的工作權利？以及是否可能違反到憲法上保障人民工作權利和職業自由的核心概念?因此本文另以美國、英國及日本的「旋轉門條款」制度做為借鏡，建議修正我國「旋轉門條款」未來得以發展的方向。 企業界主張放寬或廢除「旋轉門條款」以促進人才流動，而實務界與學界則強調兼顧離職公務員的職業選擇自由和防堵利益輸送之平衡。因此，我們需要仔細思考如何在保障公務倫理的基礎，同時兼顧離職公務員的就業權益，並在促進產官學人才交流的發展上，得進一步建構我國良善之廉政體制，向廉能政府之目標邁進。 ;The "revolving door clause" that restricts employment after civil servants leave their jobs is the basis of public service ethics, and its constitutionality has been confirmed by Interpretation No. 637. Is it possible to violate the core concepts of the Constitution′s guarantee of people′s labor rights and professional freedom? Therefore, this article also uses the "revolving door clause" systems of the United States, the United Kingdom, and Japan as a reference to propose modifications to the future development direction of my country′s "revolving door clause". While safeguarding the foundation of public morality, we should also take into account the employment rights and interests of retired civil servants, further build a good and clean government system in our country, and move towards the goal of being clean and honest.
