English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 80990/80990 (100%)
造訪人次 : 42774683      線上人數 : 1080
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧:
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號",以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋,建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位,可獲得較完整資料
  • 進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: http://ir.lib.ncu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/95116


    題名: 《周易》卦辭的作者探究—以艮卦、晉卦與革卦為主軸;An exploration of the authors of the hexagrams in ";The Book of Changes";—Taking the Gen, Jin and Ge hexagrams as the main axis
    作者: 張惠福;Zhang, Hui-fu
    貢獻者: 哲學研究所在職專班
    關鍵詞: 卦辭作者;武王伐紂;周公奔楚;以歷史觀點解讀易經;周公遇難記
    日期: 2024-07-26
    上傳時間: 2024-10-09 16:18:16 (UTC+8)
    出版者: 國立中央大學
    摘要: 《周易》作者的解讀,「卦辭為文王所作,爻辭為周公所作」,這是華夏文化歷代以來的傳統說法。由於因緣巧合,我對《周易》中的卦辭特別有興趣。在研究《周易》卦辭的同時,我更發現有些卦辭,敘述著一個歷史事件的始末。緣此,我就研讀周朝歷史文獻,周朝初年的歷史,主要是周滅商的歷史文獻,文中蘊藏了全方位的教育概念,令我印象深刻。另外,在研讀《周易》的同時,我發現有些卦辭,似乎存在著不是文王所作的依據。於是,我將《周易》與歷史文獻相結合,試圖找出更多的線索來支持此種說法。也期望能給後輩初學者,多一層思考與判斷。
    本論文的研究方法,以文獻分析法(Document Analysis)為主,內容分析法(Content Analysis)為輔。另外,再以命題邏輯之「條件證明」(Conditional Proof)與演繹論證之「混合假言三段論」,來做推論與證成。至於歷史文獻的選擇,本論文以司馬遷所著之《史記‧周本紀》與《史記‧魯周公世家》為主要文本。總體研究成果如下:1.從〈艮〉卦的例示中,以卦辭的創新解讀,將《周易》與《史記》作完整的結合,展現周公在最艱困的時刻,所呈現超高的智慧與美德。2.從〈晉〉卦的例示中,有交互參照多位學者的見解,而得到足以推論成「卦辭為文王所作」為假。3.從〈革〉卦的例示中,以《史記》為藍圖。再引經據典的深入探究,得到前所未有「武王伐紂」的正確日期。

    關鍵詞:卦辭作者、武王伐紂、周公奔楚、以歷史觀點解讀易經、周公遇難記。;The author of "Book of Changes" interprets that "the hexagrams were written by King Wen, and the line words were written by the Duke of Zhou." This is the traditional saying of Chinese culture throughout the ages. Due to a coincidence, I am particularly interested in the hexagrams in the "Book of Changes". While studying the hexagrams in the "Book of Changes", I also found that some hexagrams narrate the beginning and end of a historical event. For this reason, I studied the historical documents of the Zhou Dynasty. The history of the early years of the Zhou Dynasty was mainly the historical documents of the Zhou Dynasty′s destruction of the Shang Dynasty. The article contained a full range of educational concepts, which impressed me deeply. In addition, while studying the "Book of Changes", I found that some hexagrams seemed to have basis that were not written by King Wen. Therefore, I combined the "Book of Changes" with historical documents to try to find more clues to support this statement. I also hope that it can give younger generations of beginners an additional layer of thinking and judgment. The research method of this paper is mainly Document Analysis, supplemented by Content Analysis. In addition, the "Conditional Proof" of propositional logic and the "Mixed Hypothetical Syllogism" of deductive argument are used to make inferences and justifications. As for the selection of historical documents, this paper uses "Historical Records: Zhou Benji" and "Historical Records: Family of Dukes of Lu and Zhou" written by Sima Qian as the main texts. The overall research results are as follows: 1. From the examples of the "Gen" hexagram, using innovative interpretations of the hexagrams, the "Book of Changes" and "Historical Records" are completely combined to show the supreme wisdom of Zhou Gong in the most difficult moments. and virtue. 2. From the examples of the "Jin" hexagram, there are cross-references to the opinions of many scholars, and it is sufficient to infer that "the hexagram was written by King Wen" is false. 3. From the examples of the "Ge" hexagram, use "Historical Records" as a blueprint. After in-depth research using scriptures, we obtained the unprecedented correct date of "King Wu′s defeat of Zhou".

    Keywords: The author of the hexagrams, King Wu′s defeat of Zhou, Duke Zhou′s flight to Chu, interpretation of the Book of Changes from a historical perspective, and the death story of Duke Zhou.
    顯示於類別:[哲學研究所碩士在職專班 ] 博碩士論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    index.html0KbHTML36檢視/開啟


    在NCUIR中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.

    社群 sharing

    ::: Copyright National Central University. | 國立中央大學圖書館版權所有 | 收藏本站 | 設為首頁 | 最佳瀏覽畫面: 1024*768 | 建站日期:8-24-2009 :::
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 隱私權政策聲明