近年來，假訊息透過Facebook、YouTube、LINE等社群平台大量散布，不僅衝擊民主秩序，也對公共安全與社會信任造成實質威脅。我國現行假訊息管制制度以發言者為主要規範對象，欠缺中介者對社群平台的責任加以管制。本文以「中介者管制模式」為核心，透過比較法觀點分析美國《通訊端正法》第230條與德國《網路執行法》(NetzDG)之立法與執行實況，歸納兩者在言論自由與假訊息管制之間所採取方式及差異性。本文據此提出我國未來立法建議，包括設置獨立監理機構、明確界定免責範圍、建立審查時效條款、強化申訴救濟機制及透明報告義務，期能在保障言論自由與有效遏止假訊息。;In recent years, disinformation has spread rapidly through social media platforms such as Facebook, YouTube, and LINE, posing significant threats to democratic order, public safety, and social trust. Taiwan′s current legal framework for regulating disinformation primarily targets individual speakers, while lacking adequate regulation of intermediaries such as digital platforms. This thesis focuses on the “intermediary regulation model” and adopts a comparative legal approach to analyze the legislative design and enforcement practices of Section 230 of the U.S. Communications Decency Act (CDA) and Germany′s Network Enforcement Act (NetzDG). It highlights the differences between the two in balancing freedom of speech with the need to combat disinformation. Based on this analysis, the thesis proposes several legislative recommendations for Taiwan, including the establishment of an independent regulatory body, clear delineation of liability exemptions, implementation of content review deadlines, enhancement of appeals and remedies, and mandatory transparency reports. These measures aim to achieve a balance between protecting freedom of expression and effectively curbing the spread of disinformation.
