English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 84432/84432 (100%)
造訪人次 : 65812869      線上人數 : 185
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧:
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號",以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋,建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位,可獲得較完整資料
  • 進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://ir.lib.ncu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/99295


    題名: 地方政府族群文化政策契約委外績效觀感之研究: 以鍾肇政文學生活園區為例;Perceptions of Performance in Contractual Outsourcing of Local Government Ethnic Cultural Policies: A Case Study of the Chung-Chao-Cheng Literary Park
    作者: 周育丞;CHOU, YU-CHENG
    貢獻者: 法律與政府研究所
    關鍵詞: 族群文化政策;契約委外;績效觀感;客家文化;公私協力;Ethnic Cultural Policy;Contracting Out;Performance Perception;Hakka Culture;Public-Private Collaboration
    日期: 2025-10-23
    上傳時間: 2026-03-06 18:33:49 (UTC+8)
    出版者: 國立中央大學
    摘要: 本研究旨在探討臺灣地方政府於推動族群文化政策過程中,採行契約委外模
    式所產生之實務成效,並進一步分析利害關係人對其績效的觀感。當前公共服務
    需求不斷增加,而政府人力與資源相對有限,契約委外遂逐漸成為當代治理的重
    要工具。在族群文化政策領域,更高度依賴民間能量的參與,以推動文化之傳承
    與發展。然而,文化政策本身具有高度抽象性與難以量化等特質,使得契約委外
    任務之績效評估面臨挑戰。為解決此困境,學界主張應將政策利害關係人的績效
    觀感納入評估架構,以作為補充性工具,進而彌補傳統量化指標不足之問題。
    本文以鍾肇政文學生活園區作為研究個案,並透過文獻分析、參與觀察、深
    度訪談與焦點團體訪談法等質性研究方法,蒐集並整理不同利害關係人對政策執
    行之觀感與評價,進而作為族群文化政策績效評估的實證參考,研究結果發現,
    多數受訪者對園區在推廣客家文化方面表示肯定,但同時也顯現出績效評估困難、
    課責機制不足、利害關係人參與程度低等挑戰。
    有鑑於此,本文分別針對公部門、委外單位與服務接受者提出建議。首先,
    公部門應建立具體且可操作之績效指標,以利政策成效之檢視;其次,應強化跨
    部門與民間之合作與互動,以提升政策執行的協同性;最後,建構完善的回饋與
    課責機制,以增進利害關係人的參與程度與政策透明度。在政策建議方面,短期
    之目標為加強委外政策利害關係人之參與 ; 中期之目標係將利害關係人參與的制
    度予以常態化與法制化,並優化行政監督 ; 而長期之目標則為優化外部課責模式
    與強化評估者的專業能力。 期望透過上述建議 ,能有效提升地方族群文化政策之
    整體效能,並為未來相關政策推動提供有益之參考。;This study examines the practical outcomes of contractual outsourcing in the
    implementation of ethnic cultural policies by local governments in Taiwan and analyzes
    stakeholders’ perceptions of performance. As public service demands continue to grow
    while governmental resources remain constrained, outsourcing has become a key
    governance tool. In the cultural policy domain, civil society participation is particularly
    vital for cultural transmission and development. However, the abstract and non-
    quantifiable nature of cultural policy complicates performance evaluation. To address
    this challenge, scholars suggest incorporating stakeholders’ perceptions as a
    complementary assessment mechanism.
    Using the Chung-Chao-Cheng Literary Park as a case study, this research employs
    qualitative methods—literature review, participant observation, in-depth interviews,
    and focus group discussions—to gather insights from multiple stakeholders. Findings
    indicate broad recognition of the Park’s role in promoting Hakka culture, yet reveal
    persistent challenges, including difficulties in performance measurement, weak
    accountability mechanisms, and limited stakeholder involvement.
    The study proposes three sets of recommendations. For public agencies, establishing
    clear and operational performance indicators and enhancing interdepartmental and civic
    collaboration are essential. Outsourcing units should strengthen accountability and
    transparency through feedback mechanisms. For service recipients, fostering greater
    stakeholder engagement is crucial. Policy goals are further delineated across temporal
    horizons: short-term efforts should increase participation; medium-term reforms should
    institutionalize stakeholder involvement and optimize oversight; and long-term
    strategies should refine accountability models and strengthen evaluator professionalism.
    Collectively, these measures aim to improve the effectiveness of local ethnic cultural
    policies and provide valuable guidance for future policy development.
    顯示於類別:[法律與政府研究所] 博碩士論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    index.html0KbHTML14檢視/開啟


    在NCUIR中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.

    社群 sharing

    ::: Copyright National Central University. | 國立中央大學圖書館版權所有 | 收藏本站 | 設為首頁 | 最佳瀏覽畫面: 1024*768 | 建站日期:8-24-2009 :::
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 隱私權政策聲明