English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 94201/94201 (100%)
造訪人次 : 80415554      線上人數 : 139
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧:
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號",以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋,建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位,可獲得較完整資料
  • 進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://ir.lib.ncu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/99638


    題名: Does pay for performance diminish intrinsic interest?
    作者: 房美玉;Fang, Meiyu;Gerhart, Barry
    貢獻者: 管理學院人力資源管理研究所
    關鍵詞: Angestellte;Attrition;Behavior;Cognition & reasoning;Cognitive evaluation theory;Compensation;Empirische Methode;Employee motivation;Employees;Employers;Evaluation;Financial incentives;intrinsic interest;Intrinsic motivation;Leistungsentgelt;Leistungsmotivation;Motivation;Organization theory;Pay for performance;Performance related pay;Self determination;Self evaluation;sorting;Studies;Taiwan;Wage determination;Work environment;Working conditions;Workplaces
    日期: 2012-03-01
    上傳時間: 2026-04-21 13:24:38 (UTC+8)
    出版者: Routledge;London: Taylor & Francis Group
    摘要: 摘要: One concern with pay for individual performance (PFIP) is that it may undermine intrinsic interest, thus having little or no positive net influence on performance. A major basis for this concern is cognitive evaluation theory [CET; Deci and Ryan (1985), Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior, New York: Plenum Press]. Most evidence on CET, however, comes from non-work settings and, even in that arena, there is debate regarding the undermining effect of PFIP. There is little workplace-based evidence on the validity of the undermining hypothesis and none that makes use of data on between-employer differences in PFIP. Also, a close reading of CET, reinforced by recent developments, suggests that PFIP plans could, under common workplace conditions, have a positive, rather than negative, influence on intrinsic interest. To our knowledge, there is no research that examines between-organization differences in PFIP and how they relate to employee intrinsic interest. There is also no research on whether employees having a preference for PFIP plans are likely to gravitate to organizations using such plans. To the extent such attraction-selection-attrition or sorting processes take place, the likelihood of detrimental consequences (e.g. diminished intrinsic interest) of PFIP plans due to mismatches between how the organization pays and how the employees are motivated should be less likely. We find no evidence of a detrimental effect of PFIP plans on intrinsic interest. Instead, intrinsic interest is actually higher under PFIP. We also find that organizations placing greater emphasis on PFIP plans tend to have employees with motivation orientations matching their PFIP plans, which may reduce the probability of a detrimental effect of PFIP.
    出版者: London: Taylor & Francis Group
    出版日期: 2012-03
    出處: International journal of human resource management, 2012-03, Vol.23 (6), p.1176-1196
    資源來源: Business Source Premier - EBSCO
    版權: Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 2012
    版權: Copyright Taylor & Francis Group 2012
    識別號: ISSN: 0958-5192
    識別號: EISSN: 1466-4399
    識別號: DOI: 10.1080/09585192.2011.561227
    顯示於類別:[人力資源管理研究所] 期刊論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    index.html0KbHTML26檢視/開啟


    在NCUIR中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.

    社群 sharing

    ::: Copyright National Central University. | 國立中央大學圖書館版權所有 | 收藏本站 | 設為首頁 | 最佳瀏覽畫面: 1024*768 | 建站日期:8-24-2009 :::
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 隱私權政策聲明