評量的方式在教育議題中一直都十分重要。在台灣，教師與家長過於重視升學與評量的結果，考試主導了教學。學生對學習喪失了興趣與動機，學習的內容也偏重記憶性的知識與考試的技巧。本研究設計一個評量方式──學習歷程多元分析，希望能反應學生實際學習表現的評量方式。研究者並設計了一個以家長為使用者的數位平台──親師方舟，配合學習歷程多元分析，透過平台讓家長能定時了解學生的學習狀況，查看學生的學習歷程，逐漸改變對於評量的理念。研究者使用了設計研究法，研究歷經了二年的時間，將導入學習歷程多元分析與親師方式的過程，分成三個階段：指標訂定、導入學校與導入親師方舟階段。經過了多次的設計循環，重新的設計、修正評量方式與親師方舟，以符合學校、教師與家長的需求。研究對象是桃園縣某國民小學的三個年級學生的家長們，約有653個家庭與24位教師。初步發現多數的家長對於學習歷程多元分析的理念與評量方法亦能接受並願意嘗試使用，但仍習慣使用分數檢視孩子的學習。本研究觀察到學校與教師會修正教學與課程的方式，讓評量與教學更加一致。從擴展科技接受模式(TAM2)中可以了解，家長對於親師方舟的使用意圖、感知有效性、系統操作觀感皆呈現正向的態度，家長對於親師方舟能查看學生的學習歷程與在學校的學習狀況，也都抱持正面的態度。研究結果顯示，教師與家長正逐漸改變使用評量的方式與想法。 Assessment is an important education issue. In Taiwan, education system tends to emphasize training students to pass entrance exams. Parents and teachers regard grades as the sole standard of learning. Students strive for high grades in order to enter their ideal university, and ignore learning interests and motivation. Hence, this study designed a new assessment approach, called Learning Portfolio Multiple Analytics (LPMA), and attempt to balance of authentic learning and assessment. This study developed an online system to support parents understanding their children’s authentic performance and helping children’s learning, entitled Parent-Teacher-Ark (PTA). This study adopted design-based research to design and re-design the LPMA and PTA during the two years. Research process is divided into three phases: to develop LPMA, to implement LPMA, and to conduct PTA with LPMA. This PTA was conducted in an elementary school and at home for approximate 1306 parents of 1st grade, 2nd grade and 3rd grade students and 24 teachers. The findings indicated that most of parents and teachers are willing to use LPMA and PTA. In particular, this study observed that school’s administrative staff and teachers adjust their instruction. According to TAM2, this study found that parents have positive perceptions on perceived usefulness, intended use and system operation of PTA. The result also showed that teacher and parents gradually changed attitude and accepted LPMA.
