以辯證思維規律分析決策的形成; Research the Law of Dialectical Thought to Analyze the Mapping of Decisions

NCUIR > School of Management at National Central University > Graduate Institute of Business Administration > Electronic Thesis & Dissertation > Item 987654321/12129

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.lib.ncu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/12129

Title:	以辯證思維規律分析決策的形成;Research the Law of Dialectical Thought to Analyze the Mapping of Decisions
Authors:	陳柏亦;Bo-yi Chen
Contributors:	企業管理研究所
Keywords:	辯證思維;決策;策略;decision;dialectical thought;strategy
Date:	2009-06-25
Issue Date:	2009-09-22 14:40:12 (UTC+8)
Publisher:	國立中央大學圖書館
Abstract:	摘要完善的思考可以增加決策品質，本研究範圍涵括策略、決策與辯證思維規律三領域；本研究之目的為藉瞭解辯證思維三大規律：對立統一規律、量變質變規律和否定否定規律，驗證決策的本質、態勢與辯證思維三者是相同的，發展出以對立思考為核心辯證思維導向之決策模式。透過建立決策維度辯證選項表，歸納出關鍵決策維度；再以配對比較問卷進行關鍵決策維度重要性排序；最後以決策現況值與目標值之差值量表建立差值座標圖，並建議最適策略，以進行辯證決策模式之運作，形成決策。以新竹科學園區驊洲運通為個案做為實證研究，分析主管的決策思維；實證結果發現：個案公司短期內欲達成損益兩平目標，決策時應依序參考財務、資源、市場、態度、策略和結構六大關鍵維度之正反辯項，其中策略維度應採躍昇策略，其餘維度皆應採互滲策略。 Abstract The perfect ponder may increase the decision-making quality. This study contains strategy, decision and dialectical thought law. The goals of the research by understanding the three important laws of dialectical thought：the contradiction law, the qualitative and quantitative exchange law and the negation of negation law. The decision-making's essence and the situation and the dialectical thought are comfirmed all the same. An analytical dialectic thought oriented decision-meaking model is developed. The dialectical decision model operates by establishing decision-making dimension dialectical option table and Inducing the key decision dimension; using the comparison questionnaire to sort the key decision dimension; finally computing the difference between the decision-making current value and target value and building up a differential value graph. Then suggests the most suitable strategy. HUA-JHOU Company in the Hsinchu Scientific Park is chosen as The empirical study case. After analyzing managers’ decision-making thought; the results are found: the company wants to achieve two even goals of the profit and loss in short-term, the managers make decision should refer the debates to pro and con in order of financial, resource, market, manner, strategy and structure six important essential dimensions . The strategy dimension should use the jump strategy, other dimensions should all use the infiltrate strategy respectively.
Appears in Collections:	[Graduate Institute of Business Administration] Electronic Thesis & Dissertation

Files in This Item:

File	Size	Format

社群 sharing

Loading...