English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 67621/67621 (100%)
Visitors : 23061136      Online Users : 237
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version

    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.lib.ncu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/46524

    Title: 擔責與參考架構訓練對考核結果正確度之影響-2x3實驗因子設計;An Experimental Study of Accountability and Frame of Reference Training on Rating Accuracy
    Authors: 黃湘淇;Hsiang-Chi Huang
    Contributors: 人力資源管理研究所
    Keywords: 程序擔責;結果擔責;參考架構訓練;考核正確度;procedural accountability;outcome accountabilit
    Date: 2011-01-21
    Issue Date: 2011-06-04 16:26:37 (UTC+8)
    Publisher: 國立中央大學
    Abstract: 現今組織中的績效考核,往往由於缺乏公正的評量,而使人力資源管理的效益不如預期。過去研究幾乎未針對擔責(Accountability)與參考架構訓練(Frame of Reference Training)實驗設計做探討。因此,本研究採用實驗設計,讓考核者對績效評估擔責,以及使用參考架構訓練,以檢視其提升考核品質的效果。最後以整合性的觀點,交互進行擔責與參考架構訓練,再次檢驗考核正確度的提升。本研究以台灣北部某一大型醫院中68位中、高階主管為研究樣本,將其分成六組:(1)程序擔責組並接受參考架構訓練;(2)結果擔責組並接受參考架構訓練;(3)無擔責組並接受參考架構訓練;(4)程序擔責組,無訓練;(5)結果擔責組,無訓練;(6)無擔責組,亦無訓練。研究結果發現,接受參考架構訓練的考核者對寬容誤差與考核正確度有顯著影響,同時擔責與接受參考架構訓練的考核者亦對寬容誤差與考核正確度有顯著影響,而擔責組本身不具任何影響。最後,本研究針對研究結果進行討論並對後續研究與績效管理提供參考方向。 This study tested effects of holding performance rater accountable for either the procedural or outcome accountability they follow to make evaluation or trained with frame of reference (FOR) training on rating accuracy. 68 hospital managers listened to voice clips of 3 telephone marketers solicitation and processed performance rating in an experiment, which crossed 3 levels of accountability with 2 levels of FOR training. The impact of the accountabilities and FOR training on rating accuracy was assessed across six conditions in the following experimental framework: (1) no accountability trained with FOR training, (2) procedural accountability with FOR training, (3) outcome accountability with FOR training, (4) no accountability without training, (5) procedural accountability without training, (6) outcome accountability without training. The dependent variable was the correlation on leniency, halo, and distance accuracy of performance ratings in field settings. Results showed that FOR training upgrades rating accuracy and reduces halo effect, and outcome accountability with FOR training increased rating accuracy and procedural accountability lowered it.
    Appears in Collections:[人力資源管理研究所] 博碩士論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat

    All items in NCUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    社群 sharing

    ::: Copyright National Central University. | 國立中央大學圖書館版權所有 | 收藏本站 | 設為首頁 | 最佳瀏覽畫面: 1024*768 | 建站日期:8-24-2009 :::
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback  - 隱私權政策聲明