本研究探討董監事會職能與企業營運績效之關聯性，並探討董監事會兩種主要功能（監督控制、資源提供）的互補效果，對於企業績效帶來之影響。蒐集台灣2010年到2015年臺灣上市公司為研究樣本，根據臺灣經濟新報（TEJ）臺灣董監事職責與專業度DB資料庫，提出七項董事會職能：董監事會規模、內部董事與外部董事人數、獨立董事兼職數、董監事會開會次數、出席率與董監事教育程度、專業經歷來歸納剖析。 實證結果發現，董監事會的職能在財務績效（ROA）數據顯示較不顯著，而市場績效（Tobin’s Q）數據顯示較為顯著。市場績效所反映的是投資者如何看待市場及體現企業在市場的情形，故董監事會職能之於整體的公司市場績效還是有其需求，例如可以反映在公司的股價上，然而能否確實地提高企業財務績效，我們從實證結果中瞭解，還是有些困難的。 另外，董監事會監督控制功能與資源提供功能的互補效果是具有正向但不顯著的關係，再經分組處理後，研究顯示相較於監督控制功能和資源提供功能都較弱或只有單一功能較強的企業，對於企業營運績效的差別並不大；只有將董監事會的監督控制功能與資源提供功能效果一起提昇，對於公司的營運績效才有提高的效果。 ;The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between board competency and corporate performance. Furthermore, Discussing the two main function of the board (monitoring and resourcing), and how it impact to firm performance. Based on TEJ Taiwan’s board responsibilities and professionalism DB data, listing companies in Taiwan form 2010 to 2015 as sample. There are seven board competency: size of board, rate of outside board, multiple directorships of independent directors, meeting frequency, rate of board attendance, education level and professional experience, which by using regression analysis method The result represents that board competency isn’t significant at financial performance (ROA), however, is significant in market performance (Tobin’s Q). As we know, Tobin’s Q shows stock price to investors, however we don’t sure board competency have impact on ROA. The result also shows that only focus one of function, either monitoring or resourcing is not good enough to corporate, only if focus both monitoring and resourcing is good to corporate performance.
