English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 67783/67783 (100%)
Visitors : 23121210      Online Users : 222
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version

    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.lib.ncu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/76408

    Title: 檢驗家長式領導和情感性組織承諾關係:心理契約的中介效果和內外控人格特質的調節效果;A Study of the Relationship between Paternalistic Leadership and Affective Commitment - the Mediating Role of Psychological Contract and the Moderating Role of Locus of Control
    Authors: 蔡佩蓉;Tsai, Pei-Rong
    Contributors: 人力資源管理研究所
    Keywords: 心理契約;內外控人格;家長式領導;情感性組織承諾;psychological contract;locus of control;paternalistic leadership;affective commitment
    Date: 2018-07-13
    Issue Date: 2018-08-31 11:08:20 (UTC+8)
    Publisher: 國立中央大學
    Abstract: 對於企業中的關鍵人才而言,財務性獎酬已經不是留在此間企業最重要的因素,企業提供的非財務獎酬—與組織的關係,反而才是影響關鍵人才留任的因素。直屬主管作為組織的代表,其領導風格將影響員工對組織的承諾,因此本研究檢驗家長式領導的效用,如何受到員工的內外控人格特質和心理契約影響。研究針對在台灣地區與組織維持穩定僱用關係者,進行線上問卷調查,問卷回收量為226份,其中有效問卷為205份,回收率為90.71%。
    研究結果發現德性領導可以同時透過交易型心理契約和關係型心理契約,以提高員工的情感性組織承諾;仁慈領導透過關係型心理契約提高員工的情感性組織承諾;威權領導則降低員工的情感性組織承諾。管理上則建議,對員工除了短期的報酬交換之外,也應培養員工與組織長期的關係,例如歸屬感和組織支持,但同時注意主管展現的行為必須與對員工承諾的一致,並且避免使用威權領導,以幫助組織提高人才的留任。;For the key talent, the financial rewards are not the most important factor of retention. Non-financial rewards provided by organizations– the relationship with the organization—are actually the factors that influence the retention. Line managers are the representative of the organization and their leadership style will affect the employees’ commitment to the organization. Therefore, this study examined how employees’ psychological contract and locus of control affect the effectiveness of the paternalistic leadership. Participants in this study maintain a stable employment relationship with organizations in Taiwan region. An online survey was conducted. Finally, there were 205 valid questionnaires.
    The study found that moral leadership simultaneously enhanced their affective commitment through transactional psychological contract and relational psychological contract; benevolent leadership enhanced employees′ affective commitment through relational psychological contract; authoritarian leadership reduced employees’ affective commitment. In addition to short-term exchanges, employers should also build long-term relationships with employees, such as belonging and organizational support. At the same time, managers should behave consistently with their promise to employees. On the other hand, avoiding authoritarian leadership might help retain key talents.
    Appears in Collections:[人力資源管理研究所] 博碩士論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat

    All items in NCUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    社群 sharing

    ::: Copyright National Central University. | 國立中央大學圖書館版權所有 | 收藏本站 | 設為首頁 | 最佳瀏覽畫面: 1024*768 | 建站日期:8-24-2009 :::
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback  - 隱私權政策聲明